The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-15716•Innovation Law Lab v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security
19-15716Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 6, 2021
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INNOVATION LAW LAB;
CENTRAL AMERICAN
RESOURCE CENTER OF
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA;
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA;
UNIVERSITY OF SAN
FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW
IMMIGRATION AND
DEPORTATION DEFENSE
CLINIC; AL OTRO LADO;
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS,
Secretary of Homeland
Security, in his official
capacity; U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY;
TRACY RENAUD, Acting
Director, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, in her
official capacity; ANDREW
DAVIDSON, Chief of Asylum
Division, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, in
his official capacity; UNITED
STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
No. 19-15716
D.C. No.
3:19-cv-00807-RS
ORDER
-- 1 of 4 --
INNOVATION LAW LAB V. MAYORKAS 2
IMMIGRATION SERVICES;
WILLIAM A. FERRARA,
Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of
Field Operations, U.S.
Customs and Border
Protection, in his official
capacity; U.S. CUSTOMS AND
BORDER PROTECTION; TAE D.
JOHNSON, Acting Director,
U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, in his
official capacity; U.S.
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
ENFORCEMENT,
Defendants-Appellants.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed August 6, 2021
Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, William A. Fletcher, and
Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Order
-- 2 of 4 --
INNOVATION LAW LAB V. MAYORKAS 3
COUNSEL
William C. Peachey, Director, and Erez Reuveni, Assistant
Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for
Defendants-Appellants.
Judy Rabinovitz, Michael Tan, Omar Jadwat, Lee Gelernt,
Anand Balakrishnan and Daniel Galindo, American Civil
Liberties Union Foundation, Immigrants’ Rights Project, New
York, New York; Katrina Eiland, and Cody Wofsy, American
Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Immigrants’ Rights
Project, San Francisco, California; Melissa Crow, Southern
Poverty Law Center, Washington, D.C.; Gracie Willis,
Southern Poverty Law Center, Decatur, Georgia; Sean
Riordan, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of
Northern California Inc., San Francisco, California; Blaine
Bookey, Karen Musalo, Kathryn Jastram, Sayoni Maitra, and
Anne Peterson, Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, San
Francisco, California; Steven Watt, ACLU Foundation
Human Rights Program, New York, New York; for
Plaintiffs-Appellees.
ORDER
The United States Supreme Court has vacated the
judgment in this case. Citing United States v. Munsingwear,
340 U.S. 36 (1950), the Court remanded the case to this court
with instructions that we remand to the district court with
directions to that court to vacate as moot its April 8, 2019
order granting a preliminary injunction. See Order in Pending
Case, Mayorkas v. Innovation Law Lab, 19-1212 (Monday,
June 21, 2021). We vacate as moot our opinion in Innovation
-- 3 of 4 --
INNOVATION LAW LAB V. MAYORKAS 4
Law Lab v. Wolf, 951 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2020). As
instructed by the Court, we direct the district court to vacate
as moot its order of April 8, 2019.
The copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of
this court.
VACATED and REMANDED.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.