The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-10150•United States of America v. RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz
16-10150Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 7, 2021
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown
Spitz,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10150
D.C. No.
2:96-cr-00464-
DLR-4
ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 7, 2021
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Susan P.
Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw,
Marsha S. Berzon, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta,
Morgan Christen, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Mark J. Bennett,
and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Order
-- 1 of 2 --
UNITED STATES V. BRIONES 2
COUNSEL
Melanie L. Bostwick and Sheila Baynes, Orrick Herrington
& Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, D.C.; Easha Anand and
Damilola Arowolaju, The Roderick & Solange MacArthur
Justice Center, San Francisco, California; Vikki M. Liles,
Law Office of Vikki M. Liles P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona; for
Defendant-Appellant.
Glenn B. McCormick, Acting United States Attorney; Krissa
M. Lanham, Assistant United States Attorney; United States
Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona; for Plaintiff-Appellee.
ORDER
The Supreme Court has remanded this case to the en banc
court. See United States v. Briones, 2021 WL 1725145 (U.S.
May 3, 2021). The case is further remanded to the three-
judge panel for further consideration in light of Jones v.
Mississippi, 141 S. Ct. 1307 (2021).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.