The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-35573•Balkrishna Setty, individually v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya Llp
18-35573Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 4, 2021
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BALKRISHNA SETTY, individually
and as general partner in Shrinivas
Sugandhalaya Partnership with
Nagraj Setty; SHRINIVAS
SUGANDHALAYA (BNG) LLP,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SHRINIVAS SUGANDHALAYA LLP,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-35573
D.C. No.
2:17-cv-01146-RAJ
ORDER
WITHDRAWING
OPINION
Filed June 4, 2021
Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and
Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion filed January 20, 2021, and appearing at
986 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2021), is withdrawn. It may not be
cited by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth
Circuit. A new disposition will be filed in due course.
Accordingly, appellant Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP’s
petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.
Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for
rehearing en banc may be filed following the filing of a new
disposition.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.