The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-56024•Enrique Anthony Godoy v. Marion Spearman
13-56024Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 2, 2017
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARION SPEARMAN,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-56024
D.C. No.
2:10-cv-07927-R-AGR
ORDER
Filed March 2, 2017
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not
be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in this case.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.