The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-55671•IN RE A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under the age of 16, ANDREAS CARLWIG v. Sarodjiny Carlwig
14-55671Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApr 17, 2015
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under
the age of 16,
ANDREAS CARLWIG,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
SARODJINY CARLWIG,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 14-55671
D.C. No.
2:14-cv-01506-
ODW-SH
ORDER
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted
March 2, 2015—Pasadena, California
Filed April 17, 2015
Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez,
and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
IN RE A.L.C. 2
COUNSEL
Matthew A. Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and
Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, Virginia;
Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson,
and Truc Nguyen, McGuireWoods LLP, Los Angeles,
California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami,
Florida; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, Florida, for Defendant-
Appellee.
Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman
Wagner, Berkeley, California; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown
LLP, Palo Alto, California, for Amici Curiae Family
Violence Appellate Project, California Women’s Law Center,
Legal Momentum, Women’s Law Project, and Professor Jane
Stoever.
ORDER
Sarah Carlwig appeals the decision and order of the
district court sending A.L.C. and E.R.S.C., dual-national
American and Swedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
Abduction (the “Convention”), and its implementing
legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act,
22 U.S.C.A. §§ 9001–11. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291.
-- 2 of 3 --
IN RE A.L.C. 3
We hereby vacate the portion of the district court’s order,
Carlwig v. Carlwig (in re A.L.C.), 16 F. Supp 3d 1075 (C.D.
Cal 2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.