The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-18067•YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a foreign corporation
11-18067Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 2014
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and
ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married
couple,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a foreign
corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-18067
D.C. No.
4:10-cv-00376-RCC
ORDER AMENDING
ORDER CERTIFYING
QUESTION TO THE
ARIZONA SUPREME
COURT
Filed May 6, 2014
Before: Richard C. Tallman and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit
Judges, and Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge.*
Order
* The Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge for the U.S. District
Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM 2
ORDER
The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended
as follows:
1. At page 7, lines 15–17, delete <<while the Coxes
were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an
agreement from the Bojorquezes not to execute a
judgment against them>> and insert <<while the Coxes
were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an
agreement from the Quihuises not to execute a judgment
against them>>.
2. At page 8, lines 5–7, delete <<More specifically, the
issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent
default judgment) between the Coxes and the
Bojorquezes that the Coxes owned the Jeep>> and insert
<<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation
(and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes
and the Quihuises that the Coxes owned the Jeep>>.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.