The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-30352•United States of America v. Florence A. White Eagle
11-30352Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 12, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FLORENCE A. WHITE EAGLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-30352
D.C. No.
4:11-cr-00032-
SEH-1
ORDER
Filed November 12, 2013
Before: Kenneth F. Ripple*, M. Margaret McKeown,
and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion filed July 5, 2013, 721 F.3d 1108, is
amended as follows:
At page 15 of the slip opinion, line 1; 721 F.3d 1108,
1116, “on or around” shall be changed to “on or about”.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the
petition for panel rehearing. The full court has been advised
of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has
* The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
UNITED STATES V. WHITE EAGLE 2
requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.
Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing
en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or
panel rehearing shall be permitted.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.