The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-10220•United States of America v. Margarito Flores- Cordero
12-10220Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 4, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARGARITO FLORES-
CORDERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10220
D.C. No.
4:11-cr-02432-CKJ-
GEE-1
ORDER AMENDING
OPINION
Filed October 4, 2013
Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan,
Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.*
ORDER
The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d
1085, is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the
second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line
2 of the third full paragraph, insert “or risk”
between the words “application” and “of.”
* The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for
the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
UNITED STATES V. FLORES-CORDERO 2
2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the
second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line
4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word
“serious.”
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the
petition for panel rehearing.
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.