The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-90073•United States v. 2013-08-13 | 13-90073 | IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT | precedential |…
13-90073Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 13, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
JUDICIAL COUNCIL
OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT
No. 13-90073
ORDER
Filed August 13, 2013
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Complainant has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay
Proceedings Below captioned as a motion in this misconduct
proceeding. The misconduct complaint is pending before me
in my administrative capacity as presiding officer of the
Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit. The Judicial Council
is not a court and has no authority to interfere with judicial
proceedings. In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct,
630 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 2011). Complainant
cites 28 U.S.C. § 2106 but that statute only applies to
“court(s) of appellate jurisdiction,” which the Judicial
Council is not.
The emergency motion is denied. The misconduct
complaint is held in abeyance pending resolution of the
appellate proceedings in the underlying litigation. See
Commentary to Judicial-Conduct Rule 3 (“[C]onsideration
and disposition of a complaint under these Rules may be
-- 1 of 2 --
IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT 2
properly deferred by a chief judge until appellate proceedings
are concluded … .”).
DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.