United States v. 2013-08-06 | 10-16696 | KRISTIN PERRY V. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. | precedential | opinion |

10-16696Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 6, 2013

Full text

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B.
STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J.
ZARRILLO,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his
official capacity as Governor of
California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in
her official capacity as Attorney
General of California; MARK B.
HORTON, in his official capacity as
Director of the California
Department of Public Health & State
Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE
SCOTT, in her official capacity as
Deputy Director of Health
Information & Strategic Planning for
the California Department of Public
Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his
official capacity as Clerk-Recorder
for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.
No. 10-16696
D.C. No.
3:09-cv-02292-
VRW

-- 1 of 4 --

PERRY V. BROWN 2
LOGAN, in his official capacity as
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for
the County of Los Angeles,
Defendants,
HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM,
Intervenor-Defendant,
and
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J.
KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ;
MARK A. JANSSON;
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8,
A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA
RENEWAL, as official proponents of
Proposition 8,
Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.
KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B.
STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J.
ZARRILLO,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his
official capacity as Governor of
No. 11-16577
D.C. No.
3:09-cv-02292-
JW
ORDER

-- 2 of 4 --

PERRY V. BROWN 3
California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in
her official capacity as Attorney
General of California; MARK B.
HORTON, in his official capacity as
Director of the California
Department of Public Health & State
Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE
SCOTT, in her official capacity as
Deputy Director of Health
Information & Strategic Planning for
the California Department of Public
Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his
official capacity as Clerk-Recorder
for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.
LOGAN, in his official capacity as
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for
the County of Los Angeles,
Defendants,
HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM,
Intervenor-Defendant,
and
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J.
KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ;
MARK A. JANSSON;
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8,
A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA
RENEWAL, as official proponents of
Proposition 8,
Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.

-- 3 of 4 --

PERRY V. BROWN 4
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed August 6, 2013
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins,
and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June
26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to
issue the mandate forthwith.

-- 4 of 4 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.