The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-72040•MARTIK SARGSYAN and KRISTINE SARGSYAN v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
08-72040Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTIK SARGSYAN and KRISTINE
SARGSYAN,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72040
Agency Nos.
A078-249-396
A078-364-947
ORDER
Filed May 9, 2013
Before: Jerome Farris, John T. Noonan, and
Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The motion for attorney’s fee is DENIED. The
government’s position was substantially justified.
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, concurring:
I concur because the statute is clear. I regret the result.
An able and experienced lawyer who devoted substantial time
to aid persons threatened with deportation is denied
-- 1 of 2 --
SARGSYAN V. HOLDER 2
remuneration for her services. At the very least, we should be
able to postpone a decision on the fees until the conclusion of
the case. The EAJA does not work well when it compels a
court to cut off compensation of careful and effective
advocacy.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.