The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-10189•United States of America v. Chao Fan Xu
09-10189Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 14, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CHAO FAN XU,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10189
D.C. No.
2:02-CR-00674-
PMP-LRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
YING YI YU,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10193
D.C. No.
2:02-CR-00674-
PMP-LRL-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GUO JUN XU,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10201
D.C. No.
2:02-CR-00674-
PMP-LRL-2
-- 1 of 3 --
UNITED STATES V. XU 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WAN FANG KUANG,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10202
D.C. No.
2:02-CR-00674-
PMP-LRL-3
ORDER
Filed March 14, 2013
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Stephen Reinhardt,
and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on
January 3, 2013 is amended as follows:
On slip Opinion page 29, lines 17–18, remove the
following text: [, and by placing in the courtroom a face and
name chart of all relevant persons]
On slip Opinion page 42, lines 20–23, remove the
following text: [The district court also took steps to clarify
the names and roles of the parties by placing on display in the
courtroom a chart with the faces and names of all relevant
persons.]
With the opinion thus amended, the petition for rehearing
filed by appellant Chao Fan Xu is DENIED.
-- 2 of 3 --
UNITED STATES V. XU 3
No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing
en banc will be entertained.
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.