The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-56567•Naranjibhai Patel; Ramilaben Patel v. City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation
08-56567Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 13, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NARANJIBHAI PATEL; RAMILABEN
PATEL,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal
corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-56567
D.C. No.
2:05-cv-01571-
DSF-AJW
ORDER
Filed February 13, 2013
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.