The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-99002•Roger Mark Scott v. Charles L. Ryan
11-99002Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 23, 2013
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGER MARK SCOTT,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CHARLES L. RYAN,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-99002
D.C. No.
2:97-cv-01554-PGR
District of Arizona,
Phoenix
ORDER
Filed January 23, 2013
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Jerome Farris,
and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Our opinion, filed on August 1, 2012, is amended as
follows: Footnote 1, at Slip Op. Page 8536, Lines 25–26,
replace <The State’s motion to strike Scott’s motion for a
remand is denied as moot.> with <Scott’s motion to strike the
State’s response on this point is denied.>
Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for
rehearing en banc are denied. Fed. R. App. P. 35, 40. No
future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en
banc will be entertained.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.