The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-55452•United States v. 2012-12-19 | 11-55452 | DANIELSON VFLORES | precedential | opinion |
11-55452Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 19, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: CESAR IVAN FLORES; ANA
MARIA FLORES,
Debtors.
ROD DANIELSON,
Trustee-Appellant,
v.
CESAR IVAN FLORES; ANA MARIA
FLORES,
Debtors-Appellees.
No. 11-55452
D.C. No.
6:10-29956-MJ
ORDER
Filed December 19, 2012
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.