The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-15763•United States v. 2012-06-15 | 07-15763 | NORDYKE VKING | precedential | opinion |
07-15763Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 15, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; ANN
SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade
Shows; JESS B. GUY; DUANE DARR;
WILLIAM J. JONES; DARYL N.
DAVID; TASIANA WESTYSCHYN; JEAN No. 07-15763
LEE; TODD BALTES; DENNIS BLAIR; D.C. No. R.L. ADAMS; ROGER BAKER; MIKE
CV-99-04389-MJJ FOURNIER; VIRGIL MCVICKER, Northern District of Plaintiffs-Appellants, California,
v. San Francisco
MARY V. KING; GAIL STEELE; ORDERWILMA CHAN; KEITH CARSON;
SCOTT HAGGERTY; COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA; COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed June 15, 2012
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson,
Stephen Reinhardt, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain,
Michael Daly Hawkins, Susan P. Graber, Ronald M. Gould,
Richard C. Tallman, Consuelo M. Callahan,
Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellants’ Motion to Extend Appellate Deadlines, or in
the Alternative to Modify the Court’s Opinion to Include
Instructions to the Trial Court is DENIED.
7395
-- 1 of 4 --
Appellants’ Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for
Rehearing is DENIED.
7396 NORDYKE v. KING
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2012 Thomson Reuters.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.