The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-55239•George Robert Huff v. City of Burbank, a municipal D.C. No.corporation
09-55239Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApr 19, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE ROBERT HUFF; MARIA
HUFF; V.R.H., by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem George Robert
Huff,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. No. 09-55239
CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal D.C. No.corporation; DARIN RYBURN, as an 2:07-cv-04114- individual and in his official FMC-AJWcapacity; EDMUNDO ZEPEDA, as an
individual and in his official ORDER
capacity; CHRIS ROBARTS, as an
individual and in his official
capacity; FERNANDO MUNOZ, as an
individual and in his official
capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed April 19, 2012
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Circuit Judge,
Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judge, and
Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge.*
*The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
4287
-- 1 of 2 --
ORDER
We remand to the district court to comply with the United
States Supreme Court’s decision in Ryburn v. Huff, 132 S. Ct.
987 (2012).
The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R. App. P.
41(b).
4288 HUFF v. CITY OF BURBANK
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.