The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-10139•United States v. 2012-03-19 | 09-10139 | USA V. HOWARD COTTERMAN | precedential | opinion |
09-10139Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 19, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10139
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 4:07-cr-01207- RCC-CRP-1HOWARD WESLEY COTTERMAN,
Defendant-Appellee. ORDER
Filed March 19, 2012
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
3373
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.