The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-50271•United States v. 2012-03-01 | 09-50271 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VDAVID YEPEZ | precedential | opinion |
09-50271Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 1, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50271 Plaintiff-Appellee,
D.C. No. v. 3:08-cr-03499-
DAVID YEPEZ, LAB-1
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50409
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 3:08-cr-02350-L-1
AUDENAGO ACOSTA-MONTES, ORDERDefendant-Appellee.
Filed March 1, 2012
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Cir-
cuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be
cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Christen did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in these cases.
2595
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.