The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-17790•United States v. 2011-12-15 | 08-17790 | TIO SESSOMS V. DRUNNELS | precedential | opinion |
08-17790Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 15, 2011
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 2:05-cv-01221- JAM-GGHD. L. RUNNELS,
Respondent-Appellee. ORDER
Filed December 15, 2011
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
21107
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.