The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-15763•United States v. 2011-11-28 | 07-15763 | NORDYKE V. KING | precedential | opinion |
07-15763Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 28, 2011
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; ANN
SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade
Shows; JESS B. GUY; DUANE DARR;
WILLIAM J. JONES; DARYL N.
DAVID; TASIANA WESTYSCHYN; JEAN
LEE; TODD BALTES; DENNIS BLAIR,
R.L. ADAMS; ROGER BAKER; MIKE No. 07-15763
FOURNIER; VIRGIL MCVICKER, D.C. No.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-99-04389-MJJ
v. ORDER
MARY V. KING; GAIL STEELE;
WILMA CHAN; KEITH CARSON;
SCOTT HAGGERTY; COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA; COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed November 28, 2011
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Rawlinson did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in this case.
20657
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.