The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-10038•United States v. 2011-10-27 | 10-10038 | USA V. DAVID NOSAL | precedential | opinion |
10-10038Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 27, 2011
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10038
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 3:08-cr-00237- MHP-1DAVID NOSAL,
Defendant-Appellee. ORDER
Filed October 27, 2011
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
19855
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.