The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-16688•United States v. 2011-09-23 | 04-16688 | DUKES V. WAL-MART STORES | precedential | opinion |
04-16688Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 23, 2011
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
EDITH ARANA; KAREN WILLIAMSON;
DEBORAH GUNTER; CHRISTINE
No. 04-16688 KWAPNOSKI; CLEO PAGE,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No.
CV-01-02252-MJJ v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
EDITH ARANA; KAREN WILLIAMSON;
DEBORAH GUNTER; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720
KWAPNOSKI; CLEO PAGE, D.C. No.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-01-02252-MJJ
v. ORDER
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed September 23, 2011
18039
-- 1 of 2 --
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt,
Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins,
Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, Raymond C. Fisher,
Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Carlos T. Bea and
Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
We remand to the district court to comply with the United
States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.
Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011).
18040 DUKES v. WAL-MART STORES
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.