United States v. 2011-02-14 | 06-55940 | WHITE V. KANE | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 DUSHUN A. WHITE, No. 06-55940
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v.  CV-05-08237-GAF
A. P. KANE, ORDERRespondent-Appellee. 
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 7, 2011*
Pasadena, California
Filed February 14, 2011
Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt, and
N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL
Arthur Henry Weed, Santa Barbara, California, for the
petitioner-appellant.
Heather Bushman, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the
California Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for the
respondent-appellee.
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2325

-- 1 of 2 --

ORDER
Respondent-Appellee Kane’s motion to dismiss this case is
granted. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in
Swarthout v. Cooke, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2011 WL 197627 (Jan.
24, 2011), Petitioner White’s request for a certificate of
appealability is foreclosed.
The motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2326 WHITE v. KANE

-- 2 of 2 --