The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-15567•Troy Mattos; Jayzel Mattos v. No. 08-15567DARREN AGARANO
08-15567Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 4, 2010
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TROY MATTOS; JAYZEL MATTOS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
No. 08-15567DARREN AGARANO; RYAN AIKALA;
D.C. No. STUART KUNIOKA; HALAYUDHA 07-CV-00220-DAE MACKNIGHT,
Defendants-Appellants, ORDER
and
MAUI COUNTY,
Defendant.
Filed October 4, 2010
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
16865
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.