The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-16602•United States v. 2010-06-18 | 08-16602 | HARRISON VGILLESPIE | precedential | opinion |
08-16602Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 18, 2010
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES M. HARRISON, No. 08-16602
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 2:08-cv-00802-RCJ- RJJDOUGLAS GILLESPIE,
Respondent-Appellee. ORDER
Filed June 18, 2010
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the
deliberations or vote in this case.
9247
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.