The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-56306•United States v. 2010-03-12 | 06-56306 | GUGGENHEIM V. CITY OF GOLETA | precedential | opinion |
06-56306Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 12, 2010
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL GUGGENHEIM; SUSAN
GUGGENHEIM; MAUREEN H. PIERCE, No. 06-56306
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.
v. CV-02-02478-FMC
CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal ORDER
corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Filed March 12, 2010
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. aco
4377
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.