The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-50452•United States v. 2009-09-30 | 07-50452 | USA V. LOMELI-MENCES | precedential | opinion |
07-50452Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 30, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50452
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
v. CR-07-00075-SGL
Central District of HUGO ARMANDO LOMELI-MENCES, California,Defendant-Appellant. Riverside
ORDER
Filed September 30, 2009
Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and
Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion filed on May 28, 2009, and published at 567
F.3d 501, is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by
or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. The
opinion is replaced by the memorandum disposition filed con-
currently with this order.
With the filing of the memorandum disposition, the petition
for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for
rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be enter-
tained.
14035
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.