The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-35672•United States v. 2009-07-22 | 06-35672 | UHM V. HUMANA INC | precedential | opinion |
06-35672Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 22, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DO SUNG UHM; EUN SOOK UHM, a
married couple, individually and No. 06-35672
for all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-06-00185-RSM
v. Western District of
HUMANA INC., a Delaware Washington,
corporation; HUMANA HEALTH PLAN Seattle
INC., a Kentucky corporation doing ORDER
business as Humana,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed July 22, 2009
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez and
Marsha S. Berzon,* Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellees’ request for reconsideration shall be treated as a
petition for panel rehearing and is GRANTED. The opinion
filed on August 25, 2008 and reported at 540 F.3d 980 (9th
Cir. 2008) is WITHDRAWN and shall not be cited as prece-
dent. The petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The panel
will file a new disposition in due course.
*Due to the unavailability of Senior District Judge William Schwarzer,
Judge Berzon has been randomly drawn as a replacement judge.
9381
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.