The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-55818•United States v. 2009-06-25 | 09-55818 | GANEZER V. DIRECTBY | precedential | opinion |
09-55818Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 25, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PHIL GANEZER and LYNETTE SOHL, No. 09-55818
on their own behalf and on behalf D.C. No. of all others similarly situated; et 2:08-cv-08666- al., GAF-RC Plaintiffs-Appellees, Central District of
v. California,
DIRECTBUY, INC., an Indiana Los Angeles
Corporation, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed June 25, 2009
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and
N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is vacated. This matter
is remanded to the district court with instructions to stay pro-
ceedings pending a decision by the United States Supreme
Court in Hertz Corp. v. Friend, No. 08-16963, 2008 WL
4750198 (9th Cir. Oct. 30, 2008), cert. granted, 2009 WL
559348 (U.S. June 8, 2009) (No. 08-1107). The appeal is
removed from the July 10, 2009, Pasadena calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8191
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.