The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-50485•United States of America v. Earl Anthony Nevils, a/k/a EARL D.C. No. NEVILS, JR., EARL BOWMAN, EARL…
06-50485Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 16, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 06-50485
EARL ANTHONY NEVILS, a/k/a EARL D.C. No.
NEVILS, JR., EARL BOWMAN, EARL CR-03-01269-CBM
JOHNSON, ALFRED JOHNSON, ORDER
“BABYCRIPTOE”, “LILAMIGO” and
“BABY FROG,”
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed June 16, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
7409
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.