The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-15916•United States v. 2009-06-09 | 05-15916 | PULIDO V. LAMARQUE | precedential | opinion |
05-15916Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 9, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO,
Petitioner-Appellee, No. 05-15916
v. D.C. No.
CV-99-04933-CW CHRIS CHRONES,
Respondent-Appellant.
MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, No. 05-16308
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. CV-99-04933-CW
CHRIS CHRONES, ORDER
Respondent-Appellee.
Filed June 9, 2009
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and
Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dis-
positive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is
GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20,
2009 is VACATED.
Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief
Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is
GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is
ordered FILED.
6829
-- 1 of 4 --
Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief
to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the
application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v.
Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993). Respondent-Appellant
shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this
order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with
ten (10) copies.
6830 PULIDO v. CHRONES
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.