The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-17161•United States v. 2009-05-12 | 06-17161 | DOODY VSCHRIRO | precedential | opinion |
06-17161Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-17161
v. D.C. No.
DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; CV-98-00528-EHC
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER
STATE OF ARIZONA,
Respondents-Appellees.
Filed May 12, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Hawkins and Silverman did not participate in the
deliberations or vote in this case.
5901
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.