The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-55732•United States v. 2009-05-15 | 04-55732 | BARNES-WALLACE et v BOY SCOUTS AM | precedential | opinion |
04-55732Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;
MAXWELL BREEN,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 04-55732
v. D.C. No.
CV-00-01726- CITY OF SAN DIEGO, NAJ/AJB Defendant, Southern District of
and California,
San Diego BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-DESERT
PACIFIC COUNCIL,
Defendant-Appellant.
MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;
MAXWELL BREEN; LORI BARNES-
WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; No. 04-56167
LYNN BARNES-WALLACE, Guardian D.C. No.
Ad Litem; MICHAEL BREEN, 3:00-CV-01726-
Guardian Ad Litem; VALERIE J-AJB
BREEN, Guardian Ad Litem, Southern District of
Plaintiffs-Appellants, California,
v. San Diego
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; BOY SCOUTS OF ORDER
AMERICA-DESERT PACIFIC COUNCIL,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed May 15, 2009
Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and
Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
5835
-- 1 of 4 --
ORDER
On April 1, 2009, the California Supreme Court denied this
court’s request for decision of certified questions without
prejudice to renewal of the request after resolution of the issue
of standing becomes final. Accordingly, further proceedings
in this court are stayed pending the final determination of the
Supreme Court of the United States of the petition for certio-
rari filed by the Defendants-Appellees on March 31, 2009
(Sup. Ct. Docket No. 08-1222), and pending the decision by
the Supreme Court of Buono v. Salazar, No. 08-472, cert.
granted, Feb. 23, 2009.
5836 BARNES-WALLACE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.