The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-99003•United States v. 2009-03-20 | 03-99003 | PINHOLSTER VAYERS | precedential | opinion |
03-99003Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 20, 2009
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SCOTT LYNN PINHOLSTER,
Petitioner-Appellee, No. 03-99003
v. D.C. No.
CV-95-06240-GLT ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden,
Respondent-Appellant.
SCOTT LYNN PINHOLSTER, No. 03-99008
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. CV-95-06240-GLT
ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden, ORDER
Respondent-Appellee.
Filed March 20, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
3763
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.