The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-56337•United States v. 2008-12-24 | 07-56337 | COHEN V. LOPEZ | precedential | opinion |
07-56337Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 24, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: RUDY A. LOPEZ,
Debtor, No. 07-56337
BAP No.
AMRANE COHEN, CC-06-01359- Appellant, MkBPa
v. ORDER
RUDY A. LOPEZ,
Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Pappas, Brandt, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Argued and Submitted
December 11, 2008—Pasadena, California
Filed December 24, 2008
Before: John T. Noonan, Barry G. Silverman and
Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL
Linda S. Conway, Orange, California, for the trustee-
appellant.
Bruce D. White, White & Roseman, Newport Beach, Califor-
nia, for the debtor-appellee.
16699
-- 1 of 4 --
ORDER
Trustee Amrane Cohen appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate
Panel’s decision affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order con-
firming Rudy Lopez’s Chapter 13 plan. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291 and we adopt as
our own the well-reasoned published opinion of the Bank-
ruptcy Appellate Panel, In re Lopez, 372 B.R. 40 (B.A.P. 9th
Cir. 2007).
AFFIRMED.
16700 IN RE LOPEZ
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.