The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-15614•United States v. 2008-11-10 | 06-15614 | RICHTER VHICKMAN | precedential | opinion |
06-15614Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 10, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSHUA RICHTER,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-15614
v. D.C. No.
CV-01-00643-JKSR. Q. HICKMAN, Warden; CAL A.
TERHUNE; ERNIE ROE, ORDER
Respondents-Appellees.
Filed November 10, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Callahan did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in this case.
15417
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.