The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-55665•United States v. 2008-10-09 | 05-55665 | CHARLES FRANKLIN MURDOCH | precedential | opinion |
05-55665Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 9, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES FRANKLIN MURDOCH, Jr.,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 05-55665
v. D.C. No.
ROY CASTRO, Warden; BILL CV-99-06900-
LOCKYER, Attorney General, RSWL
Attorney General of the State of ORDER
California,
Respondents-Appellees.
Filed October 9, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
14565
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.