The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-15977•United States v. 2008-06-09 | 06-15977 | BYRD V. LEWIS | precedential | opinion |
06-15977Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 9, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY LEE BYRD, No. 06-15977
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. CV-02-02013-MCE
Eastern District GAIL LEWIS; ATTORNEY of California,GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF SacramentoCALIFORNIA,
Respondents-Appellees. ORDER
Filed June 10, 2008
Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Johnnie B. Rawlinson,
Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani,* Judge.
ORDER
Submission of this case is WITHDRAWN and
DEFERRED pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Pulido
v. Chrones, 487 F.3d 669 (9th Cir. 2007 (per curiam), cert.
granted, 128 S. Ct. 1444 (2008). The Court’s framing of the
question presented in Pulido suggests that the opinion will
clarify how Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999), applies
to all defective jury instructions.
The opinion filed on December 11, 2007, published at 510
F.3d 1045, is WITHDRAWN. It may not be cited as prece-
dent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Cir-
cuit until further order of the Court.
*The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of
International Trade, sitting by designation.
6565
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.