The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-50169•United States v. 2008-03-14 | 06-50169 | USA VSNELLENBERGER | precedential | opinion |
06-50169Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 14, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-50169
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
v. CR-05-00064-AHS
MICHAEL LEE SNELLENBERGER, aka Central District
Michael Lee Cutter, Michael Lee of California,
Davidson, Robert Eugene Frehly, Santa Ana
Cutter Snellenberger, “Cutter”, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2655
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.