The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-76644•United States v. 2008-03-14 | 04-76644 | MARMOLEJO-CAMPOS VMUKASEY | precedential | opinion |
04-76644Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 14, 2008
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMANDO MARMOLEJO-CAMPOS, aka
Campos Ramos Armando, No. 04-76644
Petitioner, Agency No.
v. A71-616-204
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney ORDER
General,
Respondent.
Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2591
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.