United States v. 2008-03-14 | 04-16095 | FISHER VCITY OF SAN JOSE | precedential | opinion |

04-16095Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 14, 2008

Full text

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 STEVEN FISHER,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
SANDRA FISHER,
Plaintiff,
No. 04-16095v.
D.C. No.CITY OF SAN JOSE, CV-01-21192-PVTDefendant-Appellant, Northern District and of California,
San Jose CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BOLER; ORDER
OFFICER BARNETT; OFFICER CORREA;
OFFICER ESQUIVEL; OFFICER HONDA;
OFFICER KINSWORTHY; OFFICER
O’BRIEN; OFFICER RYAN; OFFICER
NGUYEN,
Defendants. 
Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it
is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit
Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2653

-- 1 of 2 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson/West.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.