The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-57037•Tyler Chase Harper, a minor, by v. Poway Unified School District
04-57037Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApr 23, 2007
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TYLER CHASE HARPER, a minor, by
and through his parents Ron and
Cheryl Harper; RON HARPER; CHERYL
HARPER; KESLIE K. HARPER, a minor,
by and through her parents Ron and
Cheryl Harper,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT;
JEFF MANGUM; LINDA VANDERVEEN;
PENNY RANFTYLE; STEVE MCMILLAN;
ANDY PATAPOW, All Individually and No. 04-57037 in their official capacity as Members
of the Board of the Poway Unified D.C. No.
School District; DONALD A. PHILLIPS, CV-04-01103-JAH
Individually, and in his official Southern District
capacity as Superintendent of the of California,
Poway Unified School District; San Diego
SCOTT FISHER, Individually and in his ORDER
official capacity as Principal of
Poway High School; LYNELL
ANTRIM, Individually and in her
official capacity as Assistant
Principal of Poway High School; ED
GILES, Individually and in his
official capacity as Vice Principal of
Poway High School; DAVID
LEMASTER, Individually and in his
official capacity as Teacher of
Poway High School; DOES 1
THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants-Appellees.
4457
-- 1 of 4 --
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed April 23, 2007
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, and
Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the instructions of the Supreme Court, plaintiff
Tyler Chase Harper’s appeal is dismissed as moot.
4458 HARPER v. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2007 Thomson/West.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.