The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-99003•United States v. 2006-12-29 | 98-99003 | COMER VSCHRIRO | precedential | opinion |
98-99003Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 29, 2006
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT CHARLES COMER,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 98-99003
v. D.C. No.
TERRY L. STEWART, Director; DORA CV-94-01469-ROS
B. SCHRIRO, Director, of Arizona ORDER
Department of Corrections,
Respondents-Appellees.
Filed December 29, 2006
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active
judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by
the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-
judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to
this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to
the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1Judge Silverman was recused.
109
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2007 Thomson/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.