The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-16910•United States v. 2006-06-01 | 03-16910 | SYNCLAIR VCOUNTY OF FRESNO | precedential | opinion |
03-16910Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 1, 2006
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY SYNCLAIR, SR., individually
and as a parent of Larry Synclair,
Jr., a minor,
Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16910
v. D.C. No.
COUNTY OF FRESNO; DEPARTMENT OF CV-01-06546-AWI
CHILD ABDUCTION UNIT; WILLIAM ORDER
FRANK; RON HOPPER; DENNIS
LEWIS; EDWARD HUNT;
KATHY MACKIE,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed June 2, 2006
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, J. Clifford Wallace, and
Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges
ORDER
On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme
Court vacated and remanded the memorandum disposition
“for further consideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corp. v.
Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. [280], 125 S.Ct. 1517,
161 L.Ed2d 454 (2005).” Synclair v. County of Fresno, 126
S.Ct. 731 (Nov. 28, 2005).
We remand to the district court for further proceedings con-
sistent with the direction of the Supreme Court.
6013
-- 1 of 2 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2006 Thomson/West.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.