United States v. 2005-06-13 | 03-70244 | PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ VGONZALES | precedential | opinion |

03-70244Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 13, 2005

Full text

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 JAIME PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ,
Petitioner, No. 03-70244
v. Agency No.
 A92-002-074ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney
General, ORDER
Respondent. 
Filed June 14, 2005
Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Consuelo M. Callahan,
Circuit Judges, and William O. Bertelsman,** Senior Judge.
OPINION
The panel’s September 9, 2004, opinion is withdrawn. The
new opinion is filed concurrently with this order. The petition
for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied
as moot. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing or
suggestion for rehearing en banc as provided for by Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.
*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft,
as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P.
43(c)(2).
**The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, Senior United States District
Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
7029

-- 1 of 2 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2005 Thomson/West.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.