United States v. 2005-06-07 | 02-72507 | TIMBREZA VASHCROFT | precedential | opinion |

02-72507Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 7, 2005

Full text

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 ROMEO UMAGAT TIMBREZA,
Petitioner, No. 02-72507
v. Agency No.
 A45-228-894ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney
General, ORDER
Respondent. 
Filed June 7, 2005
Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Kim McLane Wardlaw, and
Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Petitioner’s unopposed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of
his Petition for Review is hereby GRANTED.
We previously denied the Petition for Review. Timbreza v.
Ashcroft, 98 Fed. Appx. 611, 2004 WL 1041987 (9th Cir.
2004) (unpublished disposition) (filed May 5, 2004). How-
ever, before that decision was rendered, and without notice
being given to this court by the parties in their briefing or oth-
erwise, on March 3, 2003, the Board of Immigration Appeals
reopened petitioner’s removal proceedings. The result was
that this court was not reviewing a final order of removal,
contrary to the suggestion in the briefs. We have no jurisdic-
tion to review this case without a final order of removal. See,
*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft,
as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P.
43(c)(2).
6343

-- 1 of 4 --

e.g., Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir.
2002). The parties are instructed in other like circumstances
to give notice to this court. Our May 5, 2004 disposition,
which rested on the false premise that we were reviewing a
final order of removal, is hereby VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6344 TIMBREZA v. GONZALES

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2005 Thomson/West.

-- 4 of 4 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.