The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-99031•United States v. 2005-05-09 | 99-99031 | VISCOTTI VWOODFORD | precedential | opinion |
99-99031Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 2005
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN LOUIS VISCIOTTI, Nos. 99-99031
Petitioner-Appellee- 99-99032
Cross-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. CV-97-04591-R
Central DistrictJILL BROWN, Warden, of California of California,State Prison at San Quentin,* Los AngelesRespondent-Appellant-
Cross-Appellee. ORDER
ON REMAND FROM THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Filed May 9, 2005
Before: Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, and
Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this
case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post
Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for
further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United
States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19
(2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments
offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the
*Jill Brown is substituted for Jeanne Woodford, her predecessor as
Warden of San Quentin State Prison. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
5003
-- 1 of 4 --
proper course would be for the district court to review and
rule on the arguments in the first instance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5004 VISCIOTTI v. BROWN
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2005 Thomson/West.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.