Jeremy Vaughn Pinson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 22-16668
D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00421-RM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 19, 2024**
San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a § 2241 petition. Lane
v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
As the district court held, the record demonstrates that Pinson did not
properly exhaust her administrative remedies before filing her § 2241 petition. See
28 C.F.R. § 542.15; Martinez v. Roberts, 804 F.2d 570, 571 (9th Cir. 1986). Pinson
does not dispute that she failed to submit a BP-11 form and alleges no facts
indicating that prison officials prevented her from submitting one.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --