Khalid N. Khan v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AKA U.S.Bank.com, N.A., As Beneficiary

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KHALID N. KHAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
AKA U.S.Bank.com, N.A., As Beneficiary;
S.A. CHALLENGER, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 23-15538
D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00954-DAD-AC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 10, 2023 **
Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Khalid N. Khan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for reconsideration following the district court’s judgment dismissing his
action arising from a home loan and foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 18 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 23-15538
U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or.
v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Khan’s motion for
reconsideration because Khan did not identify any mistake, newly discovered
evidence, fraud, or extraordinary circumstances that would justify relief. See id. at
1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --